Few teenagers dream of becoming a chief financial officer (cfo) when they grow up. If things are going well, ceos take the credit (and a fatter slice of the spoils) instead. cfos seldom make the news and, when they do, it is usually preceded by a crisis. Corporate historians and markets alike judge finance chiefs by their ability to juggle the competing demands of capital structure, investor returns and investment. The imperfect scorecard for this game is the balance-sheet, the statement of what a firm owns and owes. Today’s topsy-turvy economic conditions, with soaring inflation and subsiding gdp growth, make managing it far trickier.

Since the financial crisis, historically low interest rates have allowed firms to borrow cheaply and plentifully. High profits have been returned to shareholders instead of being used to boost investment. Now the rules are changing. A new economic chapter has begun, marked by squeezed profits and higher borrowing costs.

Less than half of big American firms in the s&p 500 index that reported their latest quarterly results last week beat expectations on sales and earnings. On July 19th the share price of Lockheed Martin slid after the aerospace firm announced an earnings miss and a downward revision to its guidance. The same day a similar fate befell Johnson & Johnson, the world’s biggest drugmaker. Wall Street analysts are busily revising down forecasts of future profits. At the same time, new debt issuance has slowed and yields on American corporate bonds rated bbb, the lowest and most frequent investment-grade rating, have risen to 5.1%, up from an average of 2.4% in 2021. All this turns the calculus for what firms should save, spend or return to shareholders on its head.

Start with capital structure, a company’s mix of debt and equity. Prudent cfos have at least one eye permanently fixed on this. Firms must constantly weigh the advantages of debt over equity (interest payments are typically tax deductible; dividends owed to the holders of a firm’s equity are not) with the risk of financial distress (it is less advisable to anger creditors than shareholders).

A decade of cheap credit has sent firms on a borrowing binge. The size of the market for American investment-grade corporate bonds has tripled, to nearly $5trn. Average indebtedness for members of an index of investment-grade bonds (excluding those issued by financial firms) compiled by Bloomberg, a financial-data firm, has risen to three times earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (ebitda), from 1.6 times in 2010. Corporate America is increasingly funded by debt, especially if you exclude cash-rich technology giants (see chart 1).

As central banks raise interest rates, the cost of borrowing is rising for the first time in years, and sharply. Even so, big businesses’ cfos remain relaxed about debt, with good reason. Companies had a golden opportunity to fortify their balance-sheets during the covid-19 pandemic, riding a wave of huge issuance at low interest rates. Many grabbed it, locking in low coupons on a record $1trn-plus of investment-grade bonds in 2020. Most firms are still finding it easy to pay interest on those borrowings. At the end of the first quarter of 2022, firms in the Bloomberg bond index had ebitda equal to 15.4 times their interest payments, compared with 11.5 times in 2018.

With the maturity of corporate debt pushed into the future thanks to all the pandemic fundraising, and with interest payments still within the bounds of comfort, corporate profits would need to take a huge hammering before cfos begin to lose sleep over debt. According to a survey of American cfos conducted in May and June by Duke University and the Federal Reserve Banks of Richmond and Atlanta, tighter monetary policy ranks eighth on the list of respondents’ worries, behind a litany of operational challenges, from labour shortages to cost pressures.

These worries—and levels of corporate sentiment at their lowest levels since the early innings of the pandemic—have not stopped companies from forking money over to shareholders. s&p 500 firms paid out a record $141bn in dividends to investors in the second quarter of 2022, compared with $119bn in the same period in pre-pandemic 2019. That was on top of buying back $281bn-worth of their own shares in the three months before, continuing an explosive growth in share buy-backs (see chart 2). So long as markets remain stormy and investors seek safe harbour in “yield” or “value” stocks with high capital returns, bosses will be reluctant to ditch dividends or buy-backs. All told, big American firms may spend $1trn this year on their own stock.

For some companies, this is a no-brainer. The largest technology firms, which executed more than 25% of American buy-backs in the first quarter of 2022, remain flush with cash. Apple alone spent more than $92bn repurchasing shares in the 12 months to March. But less deep-pocketed companies have also been lavishing money on their shareholders. In 2021 more than 80 members of the s&p 500 spent more on dividends and buy-backs than their free cashflow (money left over after operating expenses and capital spending are accounted for). As borrowing gets pricier, growth slows and margins are crimped, their cfos may need to make their capital-returns plans stingier.

If the current run of blockbuster shareholder returns is to end, however, the biggest culprit will almost certainly be higher investment. The share of operating cashflows reinvested by American firms in new capital expenditure and research and development has declined during the last decade to 27%, from over 40% in 2009. Firms, investors and governments are all expecting it to rise as businesses meet the demands of the post-pandemic world.

In the short term, companies are spending more today to shield themselves from supply-chain chaos tomorrow. The inventories of the largest 3,000 firms globally, excluding real-estate firms, increased from 5.2% to 6.2% of global gdp between 2019 and 2021. This creates additional cash headwinds as working capital (calculated by subtracting what firms owe suppliers from the value of their inventories plus what they are owed by customers) is increased.

Companies are also investing for the future. Capital spending for s&p 500 firms rose by 20% in the first quarter of 2022, year on year. Mentions of “reshoring” and “onshoring” have spiked in earnings calls, amid a deepening rift between the West and China, on whose supply chains Western firms have come to depend. Ambitious pledges to cut greenhouse-gas emissions will require energy firms, which are among the most generous with shareholder payouts, to increase their capital spending dramatically. The total bill will be huge: Goldman Sachs, a bank, estimates that $2.8trn of additional “green capex” is needed each year over the next decade.

Finance chiefs who dust off their corporate-finance textbooks will be reminded that returning capital to shareholders and investing it are two sides of the same coin: capital which cannot be invested at a rate exceeding the cost of capital should be returned to shareholders, who ought to be able to put it to better use elsewhere. Dividends and share buy-backs are not, on this view, backward-looking celebrations of high profits. They are a forward-looking pursuit of shareholder value. Refocusing from capital returns to investment, while keeping a beady eye on profits and interest rates, will nevertheless require cfos to show off some exquisite juggling skills.

For more expert analysis of the biggest stories in economics, business and markets, sign up to Money Talks, our weekly newsletter.

Sign Up for Our Newsletters

Get notified first!

You May Also Like

What Gen-Z graduates want from their employers

Generation z is different. As a whole, Americans born between the late…

With or without Elon Musk, Twitter is overdue a shake-up

Elon musk’s acquisition of Twitter was to be one of the biggest…

Can Deutschland AG cope with the Russian gas shock?

Founded in 1763 by Frederick the Great, Königliche Porzellan-Manufaktur still uses traditional…

State-run oil giants will make or break the energy transition

Climate activists love to vilify ExxonMobil and Shell. These and other private-sector…